I understand golf lingo. I understand businesses often give money to charities with golf events because businesscritters like the work-sponsored opportunity to play golf.

But I still don’t know that I would have touted on social media that I “sponsored a hole”

I never thought about it as a kid, but the stores featured in movies date them just as much (if not more) than fashion, haircuts, cars, etc. Meatballs starts with the kids in a Kmart parking lot, which, outside of Australia? Might as well stop by a Woolworth’s or a Ben Franklin.

In my experience, when a doddering, elderly, clearly overwhelmed candidate flounders at a debate, he stops running for president.

If AI-written stories were any good, they’d put them on beats they perceive people care about. Instead, they dump it on topics the suits perceive as lower interest and low-impact, like women’s sports.

I don’t know that we as a society are prepared for celebrity deaths at the rate they’ll soon come. The explosion of pop culture in the 80s/90s (literally cable TV at least doubled the number of people we consider “famous”) + the boomer cohort aging could mean multiple “names” a week.

Why don’t we have a JS frontend framework that focuses on what devs want, not what Google or Facebook think are important, funded indefinitely with $30 million of a random unicorn’s windfall?

Self-hosting setup, Sept. 2024

Like many, I get annoyed by subscription pricing that doesn’t accurately reflect my needs. I don’t want to spend $5 a month for a color picker app. I don’t really want to spend $4/month on ControlD for ad-blocking and custom internal DNS hosting, and NextDNS is worth $20/year until I hit the five or six times a month it’s completely unresponsive and kills all my internet connectivity.

(I recognize I departed from the mainstream on the specifics there, but my point is still valid.)

I’ve self-hosted this blog and several other websites for more than a decade now; not only is it a way to keep up my Linux/sysadmin chops, it’s also freeing on a personal level to know I have control and important to me on a philosophical level to not be dependent on corporations where possible, as I’ve grown increasingly wary of any company’s motivations the older I get.

So I started looking at options that might take care of it, and over the last few months I’ve really started to replace things that would have previously been a couple bucks a month with a VPS running four such services for $40 a year.

Tech has created more billionaires and centi-millionaires than ever existed. They all spend their money on sports teams, yachts … but never drop a couple million on open source, even the projects they relied on! At best, it’s corporate money.

Ernest Goes to Camp is the only movie I can recall that ends with a dramaric (frantic?) waving of a temporary injunction. After the Home Alone-esque fight betwist kids and construction workers, of course.

I have been playing around with Soketi as a self-hosted Pusher alternative and, while the software is great, boy is its documentation and error messaging lacking. If you’re trying to run it and get the error

There was an error while parsing the JSON in your config file. It has not been loaded.

This is, as near as I can tell, the minimum required set of keys to get an app working:

{
    "debug": true,
    "port": 6001,
    "appManager.array.apps": [
        {
            "id": "id",
            "key": "key",
            "secret": "secret",
            "webhooks" : []
        }
    ]
}

Without the empty webhooks array, it kept failing on me.

I still have not gotten a pm2 instance to accept a config file 😭️. I gave up on the Docker instance because it doesn’t allow more than one app per instance and I want something more flexible.

I’m sure it’s great and super easy if you’re just spinning up a single app, though!

Short-term thinking

Some will point to the laws of supply and demand, which is a) facile, b) not relevant in industries like streaming, and c) not nearly enough to account for the rate of increases we’ve been seeing in consumables. The real reason, of course, is greed: Those selling think they can make more money by raising prices and enough consumers will continue to fork over the money to offset those who don’t.

Here’s where we get to the issue: This economic model ignores how people actually work.

I feel like society doesn’t give the average person enough opportunities to formally and vehemently object to things. The fun is always reserved for lawyers and people who have dumb friends that make bad decisions about marriage.

Alphabet of accessibility issues

A repost of a great accessibility resource that I want to ensure remains online

Note: This content, by Anne Gibson, was originally published at the Pastry Box Project, under a Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. I am reposting it here so that it might remain accessible to the wider web at large.

Forgive the lack of posts recently, a back injury has mostly confined me to bed, and I get a little sick of staring at computer screens.

But while I’ve been out of it I caught up on Aaron Sorkin’s The Newsroom, which I had never seen. As a fan of The West Wing and yes, even Studio 60, I thought, as a former journalismo myself, this would be right up my alley.

And it definitely inspired me … to get back into writing code. It was so bad. I was surprised at how bad it was. It made me question my own taste and wonder whether I’d misjudged Sorkin’s talent.

Don’t get me wrong, he has some good scripts, and some of his meaty monologues and dialogues in various things he’s written are an absolute delight.

But he’s also written the same show at least three times now? Including similar (in some cases, identical) plot points, themes, specific jokes, even a reference to using too much back medicine as an excuse for why a white man said something dumb.

In case you couldn’t tell from my recipe intro up top there, this is a post about how I reworked Newslurp, a little app I coded four years ago (right before the Big Newsletter Boom thanks to Covid!). I switched RSS services at one point and was using a “subscribe to the newsletter from the service’s email” feature, but the lack of polish in the app (and severe degradation of basic feed-reading) means I’m back on the market.

And rather than tying all my content to another proprietary app, I decided revive Newslurp so I could keep better control of everything. The app had a significant overhaul, with most of the email heavy lifting now being done in Google Apps Script (thus removing the need for Google API integration and the PECL mailparse extension, which is not readily available on shared hosts).

I also switched from MySQL to SQLite (because this is not really an application that needs a whole MySQL DB), and updated the code/dependencies to run on PHP 8.2

My biggest takeaway from the whole thing is that while I really love types, PHP does not make it easy to use them properly with collections or array-like objects. Yikes.

As always, I hope this is in some way helpful to others, but mostly it’s helpful to me! Enjoy.

I'm headed back to the Midwest to do some speakerizing again in August 2024.

Beer City Code 24 is in Grand Rapids, MI, on Aug 2-3. I'm super excited to present a workshop, Improv for Developers, which is where we'll do actual improv training and then talk about how those skills translate to software development. It's 6 hours (!!), but it should be a lot of fun!

I'll also talk about greenfield development: specifically, that it doesn't really exist anymore. There are always preexisting considerations you're going to have to take into account, so I'll give some hard-won tips on sussing them out.

DevUp will be held in St. Louis on Aug. 14-16. I'll be talking about greenfields again, as well as reasons scrum-based development tends to fail, and how we can measure developer productivity.

Hope to see you this summer!

Though I am no great fan of AI or its massively over-hyped potential, I also do not think it's useless. As Molly White put it:

When I boil it down, I find my feelings about AI are actually pretty similar to my feelings about blockchains: they do a poor job of much of what people try to do with them, they can't do the things their creators claim they one day might, and many of the things they are well suited to do may not be altogether that beneficial.

I wholeheartedly agree with those claims, and don't want to get into the specifics of them too much. Instead, I wanted to think out loud/write about why there's such a wide range of expectations and opinions on the current and future states of AI.

To get the easy one out of the way: Many of the most effusive AI hype people are in fit for the money. They're raising venture capital by saying AI, they're trying to get brought in as consultants on AI, or they're trying to sell their AI product to businesses and consumers. I don't think that's a particularly new phenomenon when it comes to new technology, though perhaps there is some novelty in how many different ways people are attempting to get their slice of the cake (companies cooking up AI models, apps trying to sell AI generation to consumers, hardware and cloud providers selling the compute necessary to do all of the above, etc.).

But once we take pure profit motive out of the way, there are I think two key areas of difference in people who believe in AI wholeheartedly and those who are neutral to critical.

The first is software development experience. Those who understand what it actually means when people say "AI is thinking" tend to have an overall more pessimistic view of the pinnacle of current AI generation strategies. In a nutshell, all of the current generative models try to ingest as much content of whatever thing they're going to be asked to output. Then, they are given a "prompt," and they are (in simplistic terms) trying to piece together an image/string of words/video that looks most likely based on what came for.

This is why these models "hallucinate" - they don't "know" anything specifically in the way you know that Washington, DC is the capital of the United States. It just knows that when a sentence starts "The capital of the United States is" it usually ends with the words "Washington, DC."

And that can be useful in some instances! This is why AI does very well on low-level coding tasks - a lot of the basics of programming is pretty repetitive and pattern-based, so an expert pattern-matcher can do fairly well at guessing the most likely outcome. But it's also why AI developer assistants produce stupid mistakes, because it doesn't "understand" the syntax or the language or even the problem statement as a fundamental unit of knowledge. It simply reads a string of text and tries to figure out what would most likely come next.

The other thing you learn from experience are edge cases, and specifically what doesn't work. This type of knowledge tends to accumulate only through having worked on a product before, and understanding how different pieces come together (or don't). AI lacks this awareness of context, focusing only what immediately surrounds the section it's working on.

But the other primary differentiator is for the layperson, who can best be understood as a consumer and it can be condensed to a single word: Taste.

I'm reminded of a quote from Ira Glass I heard on some podcast:

... all of us who do creative work … we get into it because we have good taste. But it’s like there’s a gap, that for the first couple years that you’re making stuff, what you’re making isn’t so good, OK? It’s not that great. It’s really not that great. It’s trying to be good, it has ambition to be good, but it’s not quite that good. But your taste — the thing that got you into the game — your taste is still killer, and your taste is good enough that you can tell that what you’re making is kind of a disappointment to you ...

I think this is true, and I think it's the biggest differentiator between people who think what AI is capable of right now is perfectly fine and those that think it'll all wind up being a waste of time. People who can't or are unwilling create text/images/videos on their own think that AI is a great shortcut. This is either because the quality of what the AI can produce is better than what they can do unassisted, or they don't have the taste to see the difference in the first place.

I don't know that I think there's a way to bridge that gap any more than there is to explain to people who think that criticism of any artform is "unfair" or that "well, could you do any better?" is a valid counterpoint to cultural criticism. There are simply those people whose taste is better than that what can be created only through an amalgamation of data used to train a model, and those who think that a simulacrum of art is indistinguishable (or better) than the real thing.

Data regulations for developers

Hopefully your organization has excellent legal representation. Also hopefully, those lawyers are not spending their days watching you code. That's not going to be fun for them or you. You should absolutely use lawyers as a resource when you have questions or aren't sure if something would be covered under a specific law. But you have to know when to ask those questions, and possess enough knowledge when your application could be running afoul of some rule or another.

It's also worthwhile to your career to know these things! Lots of developers don't, and your ability to point them out and know about them will make you seem more knowledgeable (because you are!). It will also make you seem more competent and capable than another developer who does not – again, because you are! This stuff is a skillset just like knowing Django.

That's not "real" scrum: Measuring and managing productivity for development teams

By far, the biggest reason I see scrum failing to deliver is when the ceremonies or ideas or data generated by scrum gets used for something other than delivering value to the end users.

It’s completely understandable! Management broadly wants predictability, the ability to schedule a release months out so that marketing and sales can create content and be ready to go.

But that’s not how scrum works. Organizations are used to being able to dictate schedules for large releases of software all at once (via waterfall), and making dev deliver on those schedules. If you’re scheduling a featureset six months out, it’s almost guaranteed you’re not delivering in an agile manner.

The Game is a mind game in which the objective is to avoid thinking about The Game itself. Thinking about The Game constitutes a loss, which must be announced each time it occurs.

The programming version of The Game has the same rules, but you lose if you think about David Heinemeier Hansson (aka DHH).

And no, I'm not linking to why I lost today.